Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
DeepSeek-R1-0528 leads with 5.6% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.5 Sonnet offers 137.9K more tokens in context window than DeepSeek-R1-0528. DeepSeek-R1-0528 is $15.35 cheaper per million tokens. Claude 3.5 Sonnet supports multimodal inputs. Overall, DeepSeek-R1-0528 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
This upgraded version of Claude 3.5 Sonnet was released with significant improvements in coding and agentic tool use. Built to deliver enhanced performance in software engineering tasks, it brought substantial gains in reasoning and problem-solving while introducing the groundbreaking computer use capability in public beta, allowing it to interact with computer interfaces like a human.
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-R1-0528 represents a specific release iteration of the DeepSeek-R1 model, developed to incorporate refinements and improvements from ongoing training. Built to provide enhanced reasoning capabilities based on accumulated insights, it continues the evolution of DeepSeek's reasoning-focused architecture.
7 months newer

Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Anthropic
2024-10-22

DeepSeek-R1-0528
DeepSeek
2025-05-28
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

DeepSeek-R1-0528
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

DeepSeek-R1-0528
Performance comparison across key benchmark categories

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

DeepSeek-R1-0528
Available providers and their performance metrics

Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Anthropic
Bedrock

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

DeepSeek-R1-0528

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

DeepSeek-R1-0528

DeepSeek-R1-0528
DeepInfra
DeepSeek
Novita