Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude 3.5 Sonnet leads with 5.1% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.5 Sonnet offers 144.0K more tokens in context window than DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B. DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B is $17.70 cheaper per million tokens. Claude 3.5 Sonnet supports multimodal inputs. Claude 3.5 Sonnet is available on 3 providers. Overall, Claude 3.5 Sonnet is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
This upgraded version of Claude 3.5 Sonnet was released with significant improvements in coding and agentic tool use. Built to deliver enhanced performance in software engineering tasks, it brought substantial gains in reasoning and problem-solving while introducing the groundbreaking computer use capability in public beta, allowing it to interact with computer interfaces like a human.
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B was created as a larger distilled variant, designed to transfer more of DeepSeek-R1's reasoning capabilities into a Qwen-based foundation. Built to serve applications requiring enhanced analytical depth, it represents a powerful option in the distilled reasoning model family.
3 months newer

Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Anthropic
2024-10-22

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
DeepSeek
2025-01-20
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
Available providers and their performance metrics

Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Anthropic
Bedrock

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
DeepInfra