+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs DeepSeek VL2
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude 3.5 Sonnet leads with 8.4% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.5 Sonnet offers 141.4K more tokens in context window than DeepSeek VL2. Claude 3.5 Sonnet is $4791.50 cheaper per million tokens. Claude 3.5 Sonnet is available on 3 providers. Overall, Claude 3.5 Sonnet is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
This upgraded version of Claude 3.5 Sonnet was released with significant improvements in coding and agentic tool use. Built to deliver enhanced performance in software engineering tasks, it brought substantial gains in reasoning and problem-solving while introducing the groundbreaking computer use capability in public beta, allowing it to interact with computer interfaces like a human.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-VL2 was developed as a vision-language model, designed to handle both visual and textual inputs for multimodal understanding tasks. Built to extend DeepSeek's capabilities beyond text-only processing, it enables applications requiring integrated analysis of images and language.
1 month newer
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Anthropic
2024-10-22
DeepSeek VL2
DeepSeek
2024-12-13
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Input:$3.00
Output:$15.00($4791.50 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2
Input:$9.50
Output:$4800.00
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 5 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Average Score:83.3%(+8.4%)
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2
Average Score:74.9%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
3 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Bedrock
Throughput: 101 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Avg Score:83.3%(+8.4%)
Providers:3
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2
Avg Score:74.9%
Providers:1