Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude 3.5 Sonnet leads with 29.0% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.5 Sonnet offers 359.0K more tokens in context window than Gemini 1.0 Pro. Gemini 1.0 Pro is $16.00 cheaper per million tokens. Claude 3.5 Sonnet supports multimodal inputs. Claude 3.5 Sonnet is available on 3 providers. Overall, Claude 3.5 Sonnet is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
This upgraded version of Claude 3.5 Sonnet was released with significant improvements in coding and agentic tool use. Built to deliver enhanced performance in software engineering tasks, it brought substantial gains in reasoning and problem-solving while introducing the groundbreaking computer use capability in public beta, allowing it to interact with computer interfaces like a human.
Gemini 1.0 Pro was developed as Google's initial production-ready multimodal model, designed to handle text and provide strong performance across diverse tasks. Built to serve as a versatile foundation for applications requiring reliable language understanding and generation, it introduced the Gemini architecture to developers and enterprises.
8 months newer

Gemini 1.0 Pro
2024-02-15

Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Anthropic
2024-10-22
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Gemini 1.0 Pro
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 5 common benchmarks

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Gemini 1.0 Pro
Gemini 1.0 Pro
2024-02-01
Available providers and their performance metrics

Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Anthropic
Bedrock

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Gemini 1.0 Pro

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Gemini 1.0 Pro

Gemini 1.0 Pro