Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude 3.5 Sonnet leads with 5.1% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite offers 714.1K more tokens in context window than Claude 3.5 Sonnet. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is $17.50 cheaper per million tokens. Claude 3.5 Sonnet is available on 3 providers. Overall, Claude 3.5 Sonnet is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
This upgraded version of Claude 3.5 Sonnet was released with significant improvements in coding and agentic tool use. Built to deliver enhanced performance in software engineering tasks, it brought substantial gains in reasoning and problem-solving while introducing the groundbreaking computer use capability in public beta, allowing it to interact with computer interfaces like a human.
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite was created as the most efficient option in the Gemini 2.5 family, designed to provide cutting-edge capabilities with minimal computational overhead. Built for applications where cost and latency are primary concerns, it extends advanced multimodal understanding to resource-conscious deployments.
7 months newer

Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Anthropic
2024-10-22

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
2025-06-17
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Performance comparison across key benchmark categories

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
2025-01-01
Available providers and their performance metrics

Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Anthropic
Bedrock

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite