Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.5 Pro leads with 13.8% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.5 Pro offers 714.1K more tokens in context window than Claude 3.5 Sonnet. Gemini 2.5 Pro is $6.75 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, Gemini 2.5 Pro is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
This upgraded version of Claude 3.5 Sonnet was released with significant improvements in coding and agentic tool use. Built to deliver enhanced performance in software engineering tasks, it brought substantial gains in reasoning and problem-solving while introducing the groundbreaking computer use capability in public beta, allowing it to interact with computer interfaces like a human.
Gemini 2.5 Pro was developed as Google's most intelligent AI model, designed to comprehend vast datasets and challenging problems from diverse information sources including text, audio, images, and video. Built to handle complex reasoning and multi-step problem solving, it represents Google's flagship offering for enterprise and advanced applications.
7 months newer

Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Anthropic
2024-10-22

Gemini 2.5 Pro
2025-05-20
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Gemini 2.5 Pro
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Gemini 2.5 Pro
Performance comparison across key benchmark categories

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Gemini 2.5 Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro
2025-01-31
Available providers and their performance metrics

Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Anthropic
Bedrock

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Gemini 2.5 Pro

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Gemini 2.5 Pro

Gemini 2.5 Pro
ZeroEval