+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs Gemma 3 1B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude 3.5 Sonnet leads with 46.8% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.5 Sonnet supports multimodal inputs. Claude 3.5 Sonnet is available on 3 providers. Overall, Claude 3.5 Sonnet is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
This upgraded version of Claude 3.5 Sonnet was released with significant improvements in coding and agentic tool use. Built to deliver enhanced performance in software engineering tasks, it brought substantial gains in reasoning and problem-solving while introducing the groundbreaking computer use capability in public beta, allowing it to interact with computer interfaces like a human.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 1B was created as an ultra-lightweight open-source model, designed to enable AI capabilities on devices with limited resources. Built with just 1 billion parameters while maintaining instruction-following abilities, it serves edge computing, mobile applications, and scenarios where minimal footprint is essential.
4 months newer
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Anthropic
2024-10-22
Gemma 3 1B
2025-03-12
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 6 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Average Score:84.4%(+46.8%)
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 1B
Average Score:37.5%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
3 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Bedrock
Throughput: 101 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Avg Score:84.4%(+46.8%)
Providers:3
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 1B
Avg Score:37.5%
Providers:0