+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs Gemma 3 27B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude 3.5 Sonnet leads with 7.5% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.5 Sonnet offers 137.9K more tokens in context window than Gemma 3 27B. Gemma 3 27B is $17.70 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, Claude 3.5 Sonnet is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
This upgraded version of Claude 3.5 Sonnet was released with significant improvements in coding and agentic tool use. Built to deliver enhanced performance in software engineering tasks, it brought substantial gains in reasoning and problem-solving while introducing the groundbreaking computer use capability in public beta, allowing it to interact with computer interfaces like a human.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B represents the largest variant in the Gemma 3 family, developed to provide flagship-level open-source capabilities. Built with advanced training methodologies and 27 billion parameters, it offers researchers and developers access to powerful language understanding without proprietary restrictions.
4 months newer
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Anthropic
2024-10-22
Gemma 3 27B
2025-03-12
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Input:$3.00
Output:$15.00
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
Input:$0.10
Output:$0.20($17.70 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 9 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Average Score:87.4%(+7.5%)
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
Average Score:79.9%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
3 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Bedrock
Throughput: 101 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Avg Score:87.4%(+7.5%)
Providers:3
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
Avg Score:79.9%
Providers:2