Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude 3.5 Sonnet leads with 20.5% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.5 Sonnet offers 137.9K more tokens in context window than Gemma 3 4B. Gemma 3 4B is $17.94 cheaper per million tokens. Claude 3.5 Sonnet is available on 3 providers. Overall, Claude 3.5 Sonnet is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
This upgraded version of Claude 3.5 Sonnet was released with significant improvements in coding and agentic tool use. Built to deliver enhanced performance in software engineering tasks, it brought substantial gains in reasoning and problem-solving while introducing the groundbreaking computer use capability in public beta, allowing it to interact with computer interfaces like a human.
Gemma 3 4B was developed as a compact yet capable open-source model, designed to strike a balance between performance and resource efficiency. Built with 4 billion parameters and instruction tuning, it provides a practical option for applications requiring moderate capability with manageable computational costs.
4 months newer

Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Anthropic
2024-10-22

Gemma 3 4B
2025-03-12
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Gemma 3 4B
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 9 common benchmarks

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Gemma 3 4B
Gemma 3 4B
2024-08-01
Available providers and their performance metrics

Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Anthropic
Bedrock

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Gemma 3 4B

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Gemma 3 4B

Gemma 3 4B
DeepInfra