Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude 3.5 Sonnet leads with 27.9% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.5 Sonnet offers 336.0K more tokens in context window than Gemma 3n E4B Instructed. Claude 3.5 Sonnet is $42.00 cheaper per million tokens. Claude 3.5 Sonnet is available on 3 providers. Overall, Claude 3.5 Sonnet is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
This upgraded version of Claude 3.5 Sonnet was released with significant improvements in coding and agentic tool use. Built to deliver enhanced performance in software engineering tasks, it brought substantial gains in reasoning and problem-solving while introducing the groundbreaking computer use capability in public beta, allowing it to interact with computer interfaces like a human.
Gemma 3N E4B IT was created as the instruction-tuned version of Gemma 3N E4B, designed to combine improved capability with edge optimization. Built for applications requiring both responsive instruction-following and edge-friendly efficiency, it serves as a stronger option for on-device AI assistants.
8 months newer

Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Anthropic
2024-10-22

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
2025-06-26
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 5 common benchmarks

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
2024-06-01
Available providers and their performance metrics

Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Anthropic
Bedrock

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Together