+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs GLM-4.5-Air
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GLM-4.5-Air leads with 8.7% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.5 Sonnet supports multimodal inputs. Claude 3.5 Sonnet is available on 3 providers. Overall, GLM-4.5-Air is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
This upgraded version of Claude 3.5 Sonnet was released with significant improvements in coding and agentic tool use. Built to deliver enhanced performance in software engineering tasks, it brought substantial gains in reasoning and problem-solving while introducing the groundbreaking computer use capability in public beta, allowing it to interact with computer interfaces like a human.
+
+
+
+
Zhipu AI
GLM-4.5 Air was created as a lightweight variant of GLM-4.5, designed to provide strong bilingual capabilities with improved efficiency. Built to serve applications requiring practical deployment with reduced resource requirements, it extends GLM-4.5's multilingual strengths to resource-conscious scenarios.
9 months newer
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Anthropic
2024-10-22
GLM-4.5-Air
Zhipu AI
2025-07-28
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 5 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Average Score:61.8%
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5-Air
Average Score:70.5%(+8.7%)
Performance comparison across key benchmark categories
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Coding49.0%
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5-Air
Coding57.6%(+8.6%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
3 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Bedrock
Throughput: 101 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Avg Score:61.8%
Providers:3
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5-Air
Avg Score:70.5%(+8.7%)
Providers:0