+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs GLM-4.6
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GLM-4.6 leads with 16.4% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.5 Sonnet offers 203.4K more tokens in context window than GLM-4.6. GLM-4.6 is $15.40 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, GLM-4.6 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
This upgraded version of Claude 3.5 Sonnet was released with significant improvements in coding and agentic tool use. Built to deliver enhanced performance in software engineering tasks, it brought substantial gains in reasoning and problem-solving while introducing the groundbreaking computer use capability in public beta, allowing it to interact with computer interfaces like a human.
+
+
+
+
Zhipu AI
GLM-4.6 was introduced as an enhanced iteration of the GLM-4 series, designed to provide improved capabilities in bilingual language understanding and generation. Built to incorporate refinements to the GLM architecture, it represents continued advancement in Zhipu AI's model development.
11 months newer
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Anthropic
2024-10-22
GLM-4.6
Zhipu AI
2025-09-30
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Input:$3.00
Output:$15.00
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.6
Input:$0.60
Output:$2.00($15.40 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Average Score:58.1%
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.6
Average Score:74.5%(+16.4%)
Performance comparison across key benchmark categories
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Coding49.0%
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.6
Coding68.0%(+19.0%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
3 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Bedrock
Throughput: 101 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Avg Score:58.1%
Providers:3
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.6
Avg Score:74.5%(+16.4%)
Providers:2