Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude 3.5 Sonnet leads with 6.6% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.5 Sonnet offers 267.9K more tokens in context window than GPT-4 Turbo. Claude 3.5 Sonnet is $22.00 cheaper per million tokens. Claude 3.5 Sonnet supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Claude 3.5 Sonnet is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
This upgraded version of Claude 3.5 Sonnet was released with significant improvements in coding and agentic tool use. Built to deliver enhanced performance in software engineering tasks, it brought substantial gains in reasoning and problem-solving while introducing the groundbreaking computer use capability in public beta, allowing it to interact with computer interfaces like a human.
OpenAI
GPT-4 Turbo was introduced as an optimized version of GPT-4, designed to provide enhanced performance with improved efficiency and an expanded context window. Built with updated knowledge and refined capabilities, it offered developers a more cost-effective way to leverage GPT-4's advanced reasoning while handling longer conversations and documents.
6 months newer

GPT-4 Turbo
OpenAI
2024-04-09

Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Anthropic
2024-10-22
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

GPT-4 Turbo
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 6 common benchmarks

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

GPT-4 Turbo
GPT-4 Turbo
2023-12-31
Available providers and their performance metrics

Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Anthropic
Bedrock

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

GPT-4 Turbo

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

GPT-4 Turbo

GPT-4 Turbo
Azure
OpenAI