Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude 3.5 Sonnet leads with 6.3% higher average benchmark score. GPT-4.1 mini offers 680.3K more tokens in context window than Claude 3.5 Sonnet. GPT-4.1 mini is $16.00 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, Claude 3.5 Sonnet is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
This upgraded version of Claude 3.5 Sonnet was released with significant improvements in coding and agentic tool use. Built to deliver enhanced performance in software engineering tasks, it brought substantial gains in reasoning and problem-solving while introducing the groundbreaking computer use capability in public beta, allowing it to interact with computer interfaces like a human.
OpenAI
GPT-4.1 Mini was created as a smaller, more efficient variant of GPT-4.1, designed to provide strong capabilities with reduced computational requirements. Built to serve applications where speed and cost are priorities while maintaining solid performance, it extends the GPT-4.1 capabilities to resource-conscious deployments.
5 months newer

Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Anthropic
2024-10-22

GPT-4.1 mini
OpenAI
2025-04-14
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

GPT-4.1 mini
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 7 common benchmarks

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

GPT-4.1 mini
Performance comparison across key benchmark categories

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

GPT-4.1 mini
GPT-4.1 mini
2024-05-31
Available providers and their performance metrics

Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Anthropic
Bedrock

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

GPT-4.1 mini

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

GPT-4.1 mini

GPT-4.1 mini
OpenAI
ZeroEval