+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs Kimi-k1.5
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Kimi-k1.5 leads with 2.0% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.5 Sonnet is available on 3 providers. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
This upgraded version of Claude 3.5 Sonnet was released with significant improvements in coding and agentic tool use. Built to deliver enhanced performance in software engineering tasks, it brought substantial gains in reasoning and problem-solving while introducing the groundbreaking computer use capability in public beta, allowing it to interact with computer interfaces like a human.
+
+
+
+
Moonshot AI
Kimi K1.5 was developed by Moonshot AI as an advanced language model with extended context capabilities, designed to handle long documents and conversations. Built to excel at tasks requiring comprehension of extensive information, it represents Moonshot's approach to long-context language understanding.
3 months newer
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Anthropic
2024-10-22
Kimi-k1.5
Moonshot AI
2025-01-20
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Average Score:75.5%
+
+
+
+
Kimi-k1.5
Average Score:77.4%(+2.0%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
3 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Bedrock
Throughput: 101 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Avg Score:75.5%
Providers:3
+
+
+
+
Kimi-k1.5
Avg Score:77.4%(+2.0%)
Providers:0