Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Kimi K2 Instruct leads with 5.6% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.5 Sonnet offers 137.9K more tokens in context window than Kimi K2 Instruct. Kimi K2 Instruct is $15.13 cheaper per million tokens. Claude 3.5 Sonnet supports multimodal inputs. Claude 3.5 Sonnet is available on 3 providers. Overall, Kimi K2 Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
This upgraded version of Claude 3.5 Sonnet was released with significant improvements in coding and agentic tool use. Built to deliver enhanced performance in software engineering tasks, it brought substantial gains in reasoning and problem-solving while introducing the groundbreaking computer use capability in public beta, allowing it to interact with computer interfaces like a human.
Moonshot AI
Kimi K2 Instruct was developed as the instruction-tuned version of Kimi K2, designed to follow user instructions reliably across diverse tasks. Built to serve general-purpose conversational and task-completion applications, it provides Moonshot's accessible interface for language AI.
8 months newer

Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Anthropic
2024-10-22

Kimi K2 Instruct
Moonshot AI
2025-07-11
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Kimi K2 Instruct
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 6 common benchmarks

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Kimi K2 Instruct
Performance comparison across key benchmark categories

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Kimi K2 Instruct
Available providers and their performance metrics

Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Anthropic
Bedrock

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Kimi K2 Instruct

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Kimi K2 Instruct

Kimi K2 Instruct
Novita