Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude 3.5 Sonnet leads with 28.8% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.5 Sonnet offers 144.0K more tokens in context window than Llama 3.2 3B Instruct. Llama 3.2 3B Instruct is $17.97 cheaper per million tokens. Claude 3.5 Sonnet supports multimodal inputs. Claude 3.5 Sonnet is available on 3 providers. Overall, Claude 3.5 Sonnet is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
This upgraded version of Claude 3.5 Sonnet was released with significant improvements in coding and agentic tool use. Built to deliver enhanced performance in software engineering tasks, it brought substantial gains in reasoning and problem-solving while introducing the groundbreaking computer use capability in public beta, allowing it to interact with computer interfaces like a human.
Meta
Llama 3.2 3B was created as an ultra-compact open-source model, designed to enable on-device and edge deployment scenarios. Built with just 3 billion parameters while retaining instruction-following abilities, it brings Meta's language technology to mobile devices, IoT applications, and resource-constrained environments.
27 days newer

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Meta
2024-09-25

Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Anthropic
2024-10-22
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 5 common benchmarks

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Available providers and their performance metrics

Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Anthropic
Bedrock

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
DeepInfra