+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs Llama 4 Scout
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude 3.5 Sonnet leads with 5.8% higher average benchmark score. Llama 4 Scout offers 19.6M more tokens in context window than Claude 3.5 Sonnet. Llama 4 Scout is $17.62 cheaper per million tokens. Llama 4 Scout is available on 6 providers. Overall, Claude 3.5 Sonnet is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
This upgraded version of Claude 3.5 Sonnet was released with significant improvements in coding and agentic tool use. Built to deliver enhanced performance in software engineering tasks, it brought substantial gains in reasoning and problem-solving while introducing the groundbreaking computer use capability in public beta, allowing it to interact with computer interfaces like a human.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 4 Scout was created as an exploratory variant in the Llama 4 family, designed to investigate new architectures and optimization strategies. Built as part of Meta's commitment to advancing open-source AI, it serves as a testbed for innovations that may inform future model releases.
5 months newer
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Anthropic
2024-10-22
Llama 4 Scout
Meta
2025-04-05
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Input:$3.00
Output:$15.00
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Scout
Input:$0.08
Output:$0.30($17.62 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 9 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Average Score:80.8%(+5.8%)
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Scout
Average Score:75.0%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
3 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Bedrock
Throughput: 101 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Avg Score:80.8%(+5.8%)
Providers:3
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Scout
Avg Score:75.0%
Providers:6