+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs Mistral Large 2
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude 3.5 Sonnet leads with 3.8% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.5 Sonnet offers 144.0K more tokens in context window than Mistral Large 2. Mistral Large 2 is $10.00 cheaper per million tokens. Claude 3.5 Sonnet supports multimodal inputs. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
This upgraded version of Claude 3.5 Sonnet was released with significant improvements in coding and agentic tool use. Built to deliver enhanced performance in software engineering tasks, it brought substantial gains in reasoning and problem-solving while introducing the groundbreaking computer use capability in public beta, allowing it to interact with computer interfaces like a human.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Mistral Large 2 was introduced as the second generation of Mistral's flagship model, designed to provide frontier-level capabilities across diverse language tasks. Built with enhanced reasoning, coding, and multilingual abilities, it represents Mistral's most advanced offering for enterprise and demanding applications.
3 months newer
Mistral Large 2
Mistral AI
2024-07-24
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Anthropic
2024-10-22
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Input:$3.00
Output:$15.00
+
+
+
+
Mistral Large 2
Input:$2.00
Output:$6.00($10.00 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Average Score:93.5%(+3.8%)
+
+
+
+
Mistral Large 2
Average Score:89.7%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
3 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Bedrock
Throughput: 101 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Avg Score:93.5%(+3.8%)
Providers:3
+
+
+
+
Mistral Large 2
Avg Score:89.7%
Providers:2