+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs Nova Pro
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude 3.5 Sonnet leads with 4.9% higher average benchmark score. Nova Pro offers 200.0K more tokens in context window than Claude 3.5 Sonnet. Nova Pro is $14.00 cheaper per million tokens. Claude 3.5 Sonnet is available on 3 providers. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
This upgraded version of Claude 3.5 Sonnet was released with significant improvements in coding and agentic tool use. Built to deliver enhanced performance in software engineering tasks, it brought substantial gains in reasoning and problem-solving while introducing the groundbreaking computer use capability in public beta, allowing it to interact with computer interfaces like a human.
+
+
+
+
Amazon
Amazon Nova Pro was developed as the flagship model in the Nova family, designed to provide advanced multimodal understanding across text, images, and other modalities. Built to handle complex tasks requiring sophisticated reasoning, it represents Amazon's most capable offering for enterprise applications.
29 days newer
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Anthropic
2024-10-22
Nova Pro
Amazon
2024-11-20
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Input:$3.00
Output:$15.00
+
+
+
+
Nova Pro
Input:$0.80
Output:$3.20($14.00 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 9 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Average Score:85.3%(+4.9%)
+
+
+
+
Nova Pro
Average Score:80.3%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
3 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Bedrock
Throughput: 101 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Avg Score:85.3%(+4.9%)
Providers:3
+
+
+
+
Nova Pro
Avg Score:80.3%
Providers:1