Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude 3.5 Sonnet leads with 13.7% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.5 Sonnet offers 260.7K more tokens in context window than Qwen2.5 7B Instruct. Qwen2.5 7B Instruct is $17.40 cheaper per million tokens. Claude 3.5 Sonnet supports multimodal inputs. Claude 3.5 Sonnet is available on 3 providers. Overall, Claude 3.5 Sonnet is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
This upgraded version of Claude 3.5 Sonnet was released with significant improvements in coding and agentic tool use. Built to deliver enhanced performance in software engineering tasks, it brought substantial gains in reasoning and problem-solving while introducing the groundbreaking computer use capability in public beta, allowing it to interact with computer interfaces like a human.
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen 2.5 7B was created as an efficient instruction-tuned model, designed to provide capable performance with just 7 billion parameters. Built for applications requiring reliable language understanding with minimal computational overhead, it serves as an accessible entry point to the Qwen 2.5 family.
1 month newer

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2024-09-19

Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Anthropic
2024-10-22
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 5 common benchmarks

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Available providers and their performance metrics

Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Anthropic
Bedrock

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Together