Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude 3.5 Sonnet leads with 14.0% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.5 Sonnet offers 144.0K more tokens in context window than Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct. Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct is $17.82 cheaper per million tokens. Claude 3.5 Sonnet supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Claude 3.5 Sonnet is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
This upgraded version of Claude 3.5 Sonnet was released with significant improvements in coding and agentic tool use. Built to deliver enhanced performance in software engineering tasks, it brought substantial gains in reasoning and problem-solving while introducing the groundbreaking computer use capability in public beta, allowing it to interact with computer interfaces like a human.
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B was developed as a specialized coding model, designed to excel at programming tasks with 32 billion parameters specifically optimized for code. Built to understand and generate code across multiple programming languages, it serves developers requiring advanced code completion, debugging, and explanation capabilities.
1 month newer

Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2024-09-19

Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Anthropic
2024-10-22
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 5 common benchmarks

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
Available providers and their performance metrics

Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Anthropic
Bedrock

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct

Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
DeepInfra
Fireworks
Hyperbolic
Lambda