+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude 3.5 Sonnet leads with 2.5% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.5 Sonnet is available on 3 providers. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
This upgraded version of Claude 3.5 Sonnet was released with significant improvements in coding and agentic tool use. Built to deliver enhanced performance in software engineering tasks, it brought substantial gains in reasoning and problem-solving while introducing the groundbreaking computer use capability in public beta, allowing it to interact with computer interfaces like a human.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2-VL 72B was developed as a large vision-language model, designed to handle multimodal tasks combining visual and textual understanding. Built with 72 billion parameters for integrated vision and language processing, it enables applications requiring sophisticated analysis of images alongside text.
1 month newer
Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2024-08-29
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Anthropic
2024-10-22
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Average Score:90.8%(+2.5%)
+
+
+
+
Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct
Average Score:88.3%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct
2023-06-30
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
3 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Bedrock
Throughput: 101 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Avg Score:90.8%(+2.5%)
Providers:3
+
+
+
+
Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct
Avg Score:88.3%
Providers:0