+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs Qwen2.5-Omni-7B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude 3.5 Sonnet leads with 12.2% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.5 Sonnet is available on 3 providers. Overall, Claude 3.5 Sonnet is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
This upgraded version of Claude 3.5 Sonnet was released with significant improvements in coding and agentic tool use. Built to deliver enhanced performance in software engineering tasks, it brought substantial gains in reasoning and problem-solving while introducing the groundbreaking computer use capability in public beta, allowing it to interact with computer interfaces like a human.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5-Omni 7B was created as a multimodal model supporting text, audio, and other modalities, designed to provide integrated understanding across diverse input types. Built with 7 billion parameters for efficient omni-modal processing, it extends AI capabilities beyond traditional text-only or vision-language boundaries.
5 months newer
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Anthropic
2024-10-22
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-03-27
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 10 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Average Score:83.0%(+12.2%)
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B
Average Score:70.7%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
3 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Bedrock
Throughput: 101 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Avg Score:83.0%(+12.2%)
Providers:3
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B
Avg Score:70.7%
Providers:0