+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude 3.5 Sonnet leads with 4.2% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.5 Sonnet is available on 3 providers. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
This upgraded version of Claude 3.5 Sonnet was released with significant improvements in coding and agentic tool use. Built to deliver enhanced performance in software engineering tasks, it brought substantial gains in reasoning and problem-solving while introducing the groundbreaking computer use capability in public beta, allowing it to interact with computer interfaces like a human.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5-VL 7B was developed as an efficient vision-language model, designed to provide multimodal understanding with minimal computational requirements. Built with 7 billion parameters for integrated visual and textual processing, it serves applications requiring practical vision-language capabilities with constrained resources.
3 months newer
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Anthropic
2024-10-22
Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-01-26
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Average Score:84.8%(+4.2%)
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct
Average Score:80.5%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
3 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Bedrock
Throughput: 101 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Avg Score:84.8%(+4.2%)
Providers:3
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct
Avg Score:80.5%
Providers:0