Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude Opus 4.1 leads with 4.8% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.7 Sonnet offers 96.0K more tokens in context window than Claude Opus 4.1. Claude 3.7 Sonnet is $72.00 cheaper per million tokens. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
Anthropic
Claude 3.7 Sonnet represents Anthropic's first hybrid reasoning model, capable of producing near-instant responses or extended step-by-step thinking that is visible to users. Developed with particularly strong improvements in coding and front-end web development, it allows users to control thinking budgets and balances real-world task performance with reasoning capabilities for enterprise applications.
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.1 represents an iteration within the Claude 4 Opus line, built to deliver refined performance in complex reasoning and analysis tasks. Developed as part of Anthropic's flagship tier, it incorporates improvements to the foundational capabilities that define the Opus family of models.
5 months newer

Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Anthropic
2025-02-24

Claude Opus 4.1
Anthropic
2025-08-05
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Claude Opus 4.1
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 7 common benchmarks

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Claude Opus 4.1
Performance comparison across key benchmark categories

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Claude Opus 4.1
Available providers and their performance metrics

Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Anthropic
Bedrock
ZeroEval

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Claude Opus 4.1

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Claude Opus 4.1

Claude Opus 4.1
Anthropic
Bedrock
ZeroEval