Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads with 3.0% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.7 Sonnet offers 65.9K more tokens in context window than DeepSeek-R1-0528. DeepSeek-R1-0528 is $15.35 cheaper per million tokens. Claude 3.7 Sonnet supports multimodal inputs. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
Anthropic
Claude 3.7 Sonnet represents Anthropic's first hybrid reasoning model, capable of producing near-instant responses or extended step-by-step thinking that is visible to users. Developed with particularly strong improvements in coding and front-end web development, it allows users to control thinking budgets and balances real-world task performance with reasoning capabilities for enterprise applications.
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-R1-0528 represents a specific release iteration of the DeepSeek-R1 model, developed to incorporate refinements and improvements from ongoing training. Built to provide enhanced reasoning capabilities based on accumulated insights, it continues the evolution of DeepSeek's reasoning-focused architecture.
3 months newer

Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Anthropic
2025-02-24

DeepSeek-R1-0528
DeepSeek
2025-05-28
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

DeepSeek-R1-0528
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 5 common benchmarks

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

DeepSeek-R1-0528
Performance comparison across key benchmark categories

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

DeepSeek-R1-0528
Available providers and their performance metrics

Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Anthropic
Bedrock
ZeroEval

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

DeepSeek-R1-0528

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

DeepSeek-R1-0528

DeepSeek-R1-0528
DeepInfra
DeepSeek
Novita