Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads with 7.1% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.7 Sonnet offers 72.0K more tokens in context window than DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B. DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B is $17.70 cheaper per million tokens. Claude 3.7 Sonnet supports multimodal inputs. Claude 3.7 Sonnet is available on 4 providers. Overall, Claude 3.7 Sonnet is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude 3.7 Sonnet represents Anthropic's first hybrid reasoning model, capable of producing near-instant responses or extended step-by-step thinking that is visible to users. Developed with particularly strong improvements in coding and front-end web development, it allows users to control thinking budgets and balances real-world task performance with reasoning capabilities for enterprise applications.
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B was created as a larger distilled variant, designed to transfer more of DeepSeek-R1's reasoning capabilities into a Qwen-based foundation. Built to serve applications requiring enhanced analytical depth, it represents a powerful option in the distilled reasoning model family.
1 month newer

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
DeepSeek
2025-01-20

Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Anthropic
2025-02-24
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
Available providers and their performance metrics

Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Anthropic
Bedrock
ZeroEval

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
DeepInfra