Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads with 7.4% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.7 Sonnet offers 320 more tokens in context window than DeepSeek-V3.1. DeepSeek-V3.1 is $16.73 cheaper per million tokens. Claude 3.7 Sonnet supports multimodal inputs. Claude 3.7 Sonnet is available on 4 providers. Overall, Claude 3.7 Sonnet is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude 3.7 Sonnet represents Anthropic's first hybrid reasoning model, capable of producing near-instant responses or extended step-by-step thinking that is visible to users. Developed with particularly strong improvements in coding and front-end web development, it allows users to control thinking budgets and balances real-world task performance with reasoning capabilities for enterprise applications.
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3.1 was developed as an incremental advancement over DeepSeek-V3, designed to refine the mixture-of-experts architecture with improved training techniques. Built to enhance quality and efficiency while maintaining the open-source philosophy, it represents continued iteration on DeepSeek's flagship model line.
1 month newer

DeepSeek-V3.1
DeepSeek
2025-01-10

Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Anthropic
2025-02-24
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

DeepSeek-V3.1
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 5 common benchmarks

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

DeepSeek-V3.1
Performance comparison across key benchmark categories

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

DeepSeek-V3.1
Available providers and their performance metrics

Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Anthropic
Bedrock
ZeroEval

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

DeepSeek-V3.1

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

DeepSeek-V3.1

DeepSeek-V3.1
DeepInfra
Novita