Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads with 23.9% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.7 Sonnet offers 69.4K more tokens in context window than DeepSeek VL2. Claude 3.7 Sonnet is $4791.50 cheaper per million tokens. Claude 3.7 Sonnet is available on 4 providers. Overall, Claude 3.7 Sonnet is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude 3.7 Sonnet represents Anthropic's first hybrid reasoning model, capable of producing near-instant responses or extended step-by-step thinking that is visible to users. Developed with particularly strong improvements in coding and front-end web development, it allows users to control thinking budgets and balances real-world task performance with reasoning capabilities for enterprise applications.
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-VL2 was developed as a vision-language model, designed to handle both visual and textual inputs for multimodal understanding tasks. Built to extend DeepSeek's capabilities beyond text-only processing, it enables applications requiring integrated analysis of images and language.
2 months newer

DeepSeek VL2
DeepSeek
2024-12-13

Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Anthropic
2025-02-24
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

DeepSeek VL2
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

DeepSeek VL2
Available providers and their performance metrics

Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Anthropic
Bedrock
ZeroEval

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

DeepSeek VL2

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

DeepSeek VL2

DeepSeek VL2
Replicate