Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads with 16.7% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.7 Sonnet offers 72.0K more tokens in context window than Devstral Small 1.1. Devstral Small 1.1 is $17.60 cheaper per million tokens. Claude 3.7 Sonnet supports multimodal inputs. Claude 3.7 Sonnet is available on 4 providers. Overall, Claude 3.7 Sonnet is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude 3.7 Sonnet represents Anthropic's first hybrid reasoning model, capable of producing near-instant responses or extended step-by-step thinking that is visible to users. Developed with particularly strong improvements in coding and front-end web development, it allows users to control thinking budgets and balances real-world task performance with reasoning capabilities for enterprise applications.
Mistral AI
Devstral Small was developed as a more efficient development-focused model, designed to bring software engineering assistance to resource-conscious deployments. Built to provide coding capabilities with reduced computational requirements, it enables developer tools in environments where efficiency is paramount.
4 months newer

Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Anthropic
2025-02-24

Devstral Small 1.1
Mistral AI
2025-07-11
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Devstral Small 1.1
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Devstral Small 1.1
Performance comparison across key benchmark categories

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Devstral Small 1.1
Available providers and their performance metrics

Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Anthropic
Bedrock
ZeroEval

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Devstral Small 1.1

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Devstral Small 1.1

Devstral Small 1.1
Mistral AI