Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads with 42.0% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.7 Sonnet offers 287.0K more tokens in context window than Gemini 1.0 Pro. Gemini 1.0 Pro is $16.00 cheaper per million tokens. Claude 3.7 Sonnet supports multimodal inputs. Claude 3.7 Sonnet is available on 4 providers. Overall, Claude 3.7 Sonnet is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude 3.7 Sonnet represents Anthropic's first hybrid reasoning model, capable of producing near-instant responses or extended step-by-step thinking that is visible to users. Developed with particularly strong improvements in coding and front-end web development, it allows users to control thinking budgets and balances real-world task performance with reasoning capabilities for enterprise applications.
Gemini 1.0 Pro was developed as Google's initial production-ready multimodal model, designed to handle text and provide strong performance across diverse tasks. Built to serve as a versatile foundation for applications requiring reliable language understanding and generation, it introduced the Gemini architecture to developers and enterprises.
1 year newer

Gemini 1.0 Pro
2024-02-15

Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Anthropic
2025-02-24
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Gemini 1.0 Pro
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Gemini 1.0 Pro
Gemini 1.0 Pro
2024-02-01
Available providers and their performance metrics

Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Anthropic
Bedrock
ZeroEval

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Gemini 1.0 Pro

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Gemini 1.0 Pro

Gemini 1.0 Pro