Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads with 20.1% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite offers 728.8K more tokens in context window than Claude 3.7 Sonnet. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is $17.63 cheaper per million tokens. Claude 3.7 Sonnet is available on 4 providers. Overall, Claude 3.7 Sonnet is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude 3.7 Sonnet represents Anthropic's first hybrid reasoning model, capable of producing near-instant responses or extended step-by-step thinking that is visible to users. Developed with particularly strong improvements in coding and front-end web development, it allows users to control thinking budgets and balances real-world task performance with reasoning capabilities for enterprise applications.
Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite was created as an even more efficient variant of Gemini 2.0 Flash, designed for applications where minimal latency and maximum cost-effectiveness are essential. Built to bring next-generation multimodal capabilities to resource-constrained deployments, it optimizes for speed and affordability.
19 days newer

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
2025-02-05

Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Anthropic
2025-02-24
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
2024-06-01
Available providers and their performance metrics

Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Anthropic
Bedrock
ZeroEval

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite