Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads with 16.5% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite offers 786.1K more tokens in context window than Claude 3.7 Sonnet. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is $17.50 cheaper per million tokens. Claude 3.7 Sonnet is available on 4 providers. Overall, Claude 3.7 Sonnet is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude 3.7 Sonnet represents Anthropic's first hybrid reasoning model, capable of producing near-instant responses or extended step-by-step thinking that is visible to users. Developed with particularly strong improvements in coding and front-end web development, it allows users to control thinking budgets and balances real-world task performance with reasoning capabilities for enterprise applications.
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite was created as the most efficient option in the Gemini 2.5 family, designed to provide cutting-edge capabilities with minimal computational overhead. Built for applications where cost and latency are primary concerns, it extends advanced multimodal understanding to resource-conscious deployments.
3 months newer

Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Anthropic
2025-02-24

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
2025-06-17
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Performance comparison across key benchmark categories

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
2025-01-01
Available providers and their performance metrics

Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Anthropic
Bedrock
ZeroEval

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite