Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.5 Pro leads with 7.2% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.5 Pro offers 786.1K more tokens in context window than Claude 3.7 Sonnet. Gemini 2.5 Pro is $6.75 cheaper per million tokens. Claude 3.7 Sonnet is available on 4 providers. Overall, Gemini 2.5 Pro is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude 3.7 Sonnet represents Anthropic's first hybrid reasoning model, capable of producing near-instant responses or extended step-by-step thinking that is visible to users. Developed with particularly strong improvements in coding and front-end web development, it allows users to control thinking budgets and balances real-world task performance with reasoning capabilities for enterprise applications.
Gemini 2.5 Pro was developed as Google's most intelligent AI model, designed to comprehend vast datasets and challenging problems from diverse information sources including text, audio, images, and video. Built to handle complex reasoning and multi-step problem solving, it represents Google's flagship offering for enterprise and advanced applications.
2 months newer

Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Anthropic
2025-02-24

Gemini 2.5 Pro
2025-05-20
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Gemini 2.5 Pro
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 5 common benchmarks

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Gemini 2.5 Pro
Performance comparison across key benchmark categories

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Gemini 2.5 Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro
2025-01-31
Available providers and their performance metrics

Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Anthropic
Bedrock
ZeroEval

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Gemini 2.5 Pro

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Gemini 2.5 Pro

Gemini 2.5 Pro
ZeroEval