Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads with 52.1% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.7 Sonnet offers 264.0K more tokens in context window than Gemma 3n E4B Instructed. Claude 3.7 Sonnet is $42.00 cheaper per million tokens. Claude 3.7 Sonnet is available on 4 providers. Overall, Claude 3.7 Sonnet is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude 3.7 Sonnet represents Anthropic's first hybrid reasoning model, capable of producing near-instant responses or extended step-by-step thinking that is visible to users. Developed with particularly strong improvements in coding and front-end web development, it allows users to control thinking budgets and balances real-world task performance with reasoning capabilities for enterprise applications.
Gemma 3N E4B IT was created as the instruction-tuned version of Gemma 3N E4B, designed to combine improved capability with edge optimization. Built for applications requiring both responsive instruction-following and edge-friendly efficiency, it serves as a stronger option for on-device AI assistants.
4 months newer

Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Anthropic
2025-02-24

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
2025-06-26
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
2024-06-01
Available providers and their performance metrics

Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Anthropic
Bedrock
ZeroEval

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Together