+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs GLM-4.5V
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude 3.7 Sonnet offers 131.4K more tokens in context window than GLM-4.5V. GLM-4.5V is $15.20 cheaper per million tokens. Claude 3.7 Sonnet is available on 4 providers. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude 3.7 Sonnet represents Anthropic's first hybrid reasoning model, capable of producing near-instant responses or extended step-by-step thinking that is visible to users. Developed with particularly strong improvements in coding and front-end web development, it allows users to control thinking budgets and balances real-world task performance with reasoning capabilities for enterprise applications.
+
+
+
+
Zhipu AI
GLM-4.5V was developed as a vision-language variant, designed to understand and reason about both images and text in Chinese and English. Built to extend Zhipu AI's multilingual capabilities into multimodal applications, it enables visual understanding alongside bilingual language processing.
5 months newer
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Anthropic
2025-02-24
GLM-4.5V
Zhipu AI
2025-08-11
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Input:$3.00
Output:$15.00
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5V
Input:$0.60
Output:$2.20($15.20 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
4 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
Bedrock
Throughput: 101 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
ZeroEval
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Avg Score:0.0%
Providers:4
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5V
Avg Score:0.0%
Providers:2