Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GLM-4.6 leads with 9.6% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.7 Sonnet offers 131.4K more tokens in context window than GLM-4.6. GLM-4.6 is $15.40 cheaper per million tokens. Claude 3.7 Sonnet is available on 4 providers. Overall, GLM-4.6 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude 3.7 Sonnet represents Anthropic's first hybrid reasoning model, capable of producing near-instant responses or extended step-by-step thinking that is visible to users. Developed with particularly strong improvements in coding and front-end web development, it allows users to control thinking budgets and balances real-world task performance with reasoning capabilities for enterprise applications.
Zhipu AI
GLM-4.6 was introduced as an enhanced iteration of the GLM-4 series, designed to provide improved capabilities in bilingual language understanding and generation. Built to incorporate refinements to the GLM architecture, it represents continued advancement in Zhipu AI's model development.
7 months newer

Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Anthropic
2025-02-24
GLM-4.6
Zhipu AI
2025-09-30
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Claude 3.7 Sonnet
GLM-4.6
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks

Claude 3.7 Sonnet
GLM-4.6
Performance comparison across key benchmark categories

Claude 3.7 Sonnet
GLM-4.6
Available providers and their performance metrics

Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Anthropic
Bedrock
ZeroEval

Claude 3.7 Sonnet
GLM-4.6

Claude 3.7 Sonnet
GLM-4.6
GLM-4.6
DeepInfra
ZeroEval