Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads with 36.8% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.7 Sonnet offers 195.9K more tokens in context window than GPT-4 Turbo. Claude 3.7 Sonnet is $22.00 cheaper per million tokens. Claude 3.7 Sonnet supports multimodal inputs. Claude 3.7 Sonnet is available on 4 providers. Overall, Claude 3.7 Sonnet is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude 3.7 Sonnet represents Anthropic's first hybrid reasoning model, capable of producing near-instant responses or extended step-by-step thinking that is visible to users. Developed with particularly strong improvements in coding and front-end web development, it allows users to control thinking budgets and balances real-world task performance with reasoning capabilities for enterprise applications.
OpenAI
GPT-4 Turbo was introduced as an optimized version of GPT-4, designed to provide enhanced performance with improved efficiency and an expanded context window. Built with updated knowledge and refined capabilities, it offered developers a more cost-effective way to leverage GPT-4's advanced reasoning while handling longer conversations and documents.
10 months newer

GPT-4 Turbo
OpenAI
2024-04-09

Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Anthropic
2025-02-24
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

GPT-4 Turbo
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

GPT-4 Turbo
GPT-4 Turbo
2023-12-31
Available providers and their performance metrics

Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Anthropic
Bedrock
ZeroEval

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

GPT-4 Turbo

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

GPT-4 Turbo

GPT-4 Turbo
Azure
OpenAI