Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads with 35.1% higher average benchmark score. GPT-4.1 nano offers 752.3K more tokens in context window than Claude 3.7 Sonnet. GPT-4.1 nano is $17.50 cheaper per million tokens. Claude 3.7 Sonnet is available on 4 providers. Overall, Claude 3.7 Sonnet is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude 3.7 Sonnet represents Anthropic's first hybrid reasoning model, capable of producing near-instant responses or extended step-by-step thinking that is visible to users. Developed with particularly strong improvements in coding and front-end web development, it allows users to control thinking budgets and balances real-world task performance with reasoning capabilities for enterprise applications.
OpenAI
GPT-4.1 Nano was developed as the smallest and most efficient variant in the GPT-4.1 family, designed for applications requiring minimal latency and resource usage. Built to enable AI capabilities on edge devices and resource-constrained environments, it distills GPT-4.1 capabilities into an ultra-compact form factor.
1 month newer

Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Anthropic
2025-02-24

GPT-4.1 nano
OpenAI
2025-04-14
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

GPT-4.1 nano
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 7 common benchmarks

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

GPT-4.1 nano
GPT-4.1 nano
2024-05-31
Available providers and their performance metrics

Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Anthropic
Bedrock
ZeroEval

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

GPT-4.1 nano

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

GPT-4.1 nano

GPT-4.1 nano
OpenAI