Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads with 40.6% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.7 Sonnet offers 183.6K more tokens in context window than GPT-4o mini. GPT-4o mini is $17.25 cheaper per million tokens. Claude 3.7 Sonnet is available on 4 providers. Overall, Claude 3.7 Sonnet is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude 3.7 Sonnet represents Anthropic's first hybrid reasoning model, capable of producing near-instant responses or extended step-by-step thinking that is visible to users. Developed with particularly strong improvements in coding and front-end web development, it allows users to control thinking budgets and balances real-world task performance with reasoning capabilities for enterprise applications.
OpenAI
GPT-4o Mini was created as a smaller, more efficient variant of GPT-4o, designed to bring multimodal capabilities to applications requiring faster response times and lower costs. Built to democratize access to advanced vision and text understanding, it enables developers to build sophisticated applications with reduced resource requirements.
7 months newer

GPT-4o mini
OpenAI
2024-07-18

Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Anthropic
2025-02-24
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

GPT-4o mini
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

GPT-4o mini
Performance comparison across key benchmark categories

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

GPT-4o mini
GPT-4o mini
2023-10-01
Available providers and their performance metrics

Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Anthropic
Bedrock
ZeroEval

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

GPT-4o mini

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

GPT-4o mini

GPT-4o mini
Azure