+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs Grok-1.5V
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads with 21.4% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.7 Sonnet is available on 4 providers. Overall, Claude 3.7 Sonnet is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude 3.7 Sonnet represents Anthropic's first hybrid reasoning model, capable of producing near-instant responses or extended step-by-step thinking that is visible to users. Developed with particularly strong improvements in coding and front-end web development, it allows users to control thinking budgets and balances real-world task performance with reasoning capabilities for enterprise applications.
+
+
+
+
xAI
Grok 1.5V was introduced as a vision-enabled variant of Grok 1.5, designed to understand and reason about both images and text. Built to extend Grok's capabilities into multimodal applications, it enables visual question answering and image analysis alongside textual understanding.
10 months newer
Grok-1.5V
xAI
2024-04-12
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Anthropic
2025-02-24
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Average Score:75.0%(+21.4%)
+
+
+
+
Grok-1.5V
Average Score:53.6%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
4 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
Bedrock
Throughput: 101 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
ZeroEval
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Avg Score:75.0%(+21.4%)
Providers:4
+
+
+
+
Grok-1.5V
Avg Score:53.6%
Providers:0