Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads with 47.9% higher average benchmark score. Jamba 1.5 Large offers 184.0K more tokens in context window than Claude 3.7 Sonnet. Jamba 1.5 Large is $8.00 cheaper per million tokens. Claude 3.7 Sonnet supports multimodal inputs. Claude 3.7 Sonnet is available on 4 providers. Overall, Claude 3.7 Sonnet is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude 3.7 Sonnet represents Anthropic's first hybrid reasoning model, capable of producing near-instant responses or extended step-by-step thinking that is visible to users. Developed with particularly strong improvements in coding and front-end web development, it allows users to control thinking budgets and balances real-world task performance with reasoning capabilities for enterprise applications.
AI21 Labs
Jamba 1.5 Large was developed by AI21 Labs using a hybrid architecture combining transformer and state space models, designed to provide efficient long-context understanding. Built to handle extended documents and conversations with computational efficiency, it represents AI21's innovation in efficient large-scale model design.
6 months newer
Jamba 1.5 Large
AI21 Labs
2024-08-22

Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Anthropic
2025-02-24
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Jamba 1.5 Large
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks

Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Jamba 1.5 Large
Jamba 1.5 Large
2024-03-05
Available providers and their performance metrics

Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Anthropic
Bedrock
ZeroEval

Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Jamba 1.5 Large

Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Jamba 1.5 Large
Jamba 1.5 Large
Bedrock