Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads with 19.3% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.7 Sonnet offers 72.0K more tokens in context window than Llama 3.1 405B Instruct. Llama 3.1 405B Instruct is $16.22 cheaper per million tokens. Claude 3.7 Sonnet supports multimodal inputs. Llama 3.1 405B Instruct is available on 8 providers. Overall, Claude 3.7 Sonnet is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude 3.7 Sonnet represents Anthropic's first hybrid reasoning model, capable of producing near-instant responses or extended step-by-step thinking that is visible to users. Developed with particularly strong improvements in coding and front-end web development, it allows users to control thinking budgets and balances real-world task performance with reasoning capabilities for enterprise applications.
Meta
Llama 3.1 405B was developed as Meta's largest open-source language model, designed to provide frontier-level capabilities with 405 billion parameters. Built to demonstrate that open-source models can match proprietary systems in capability, it enables researchers and developers to experiment with and deploy a powerful foundation model without licensing restrictions.
7 months newer

Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
Meta
2024-07-23

Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Anthropic
2025-02-24
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
Available providers and their performance metrics

Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Anthropic
Bedrock
ZeroEval

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Llama 3.1 405B Instruct

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Llama 3.1 405B Instruct

Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
Bedrock
DeepInfra
Fireworks
Hyperbolic
Lambda
Replicate
Together