Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads with 38.1% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.7 Sonnet offers 72.0K more tokens in context window than Llama 3.2 11B Instruct. Llama 3.2 11B Instruct is $17.90 cheaper per million tokens. Llama 3.2 11B Instruct is available on 6 providers. Overall, Claude 3.7 Sonnet is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude 3.7 Sonnet represents Anthropic's first hybrid reasoning model, capable of producing near-instant responses or extended step-by-step thinking that is visible to users. Developed with particularly strong improvements in coding and front-end web development, it allows users to control thinking budgets and balances real-world task performance with reasoning capabilities for enterprise applications.
Meta
Llama 3.2 11B was introduced as a mid-sized variant in the Llama 3.2 family, designed to offer enhanced capabilities while maintaining efficiency. Built to provide a balanced option for applications requiring more than lightweight models but less than flagship sizes, it serves diverse use cases in the open-source community.
5 months newer

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
Meta
2024-09-25

Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Anthropic
2025-02-24
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
2023-12-31
Available providers and their performance metrics

Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Anthropic
Bedrock
ZeroEval

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
Bedrock
DeepInfra
Fireworks
Groq
Sambanova
Together