Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads with 24.9% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.7 Sonnet offers 264.0K more tokens in context window than Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct. Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct is $17.79 cheaper per million tokens. Claude 3.7 Sonnet supports multimodal inputs. Claude 3.7 Sonnet is available on 4 providers. Overall, Claude 3.7 Sonnet is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude 3.7 Sonnet represents Anthropic's first hybrid reasoning model, capable of producing near-instant responses or extended step-by-step thinking that is visible to users. Developed with particularly strong improvements in coding and front-end web development, it allows users to control thinking budgets and balances real-world task performance with reasoning capabilities for enterprise applications.
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 24B Instruct was created as the instruction-tuned version of the 24B base model, designed to follow user instructions reliably. Built to serve general-purpose applications requiring moderate capability, it balances performance with deployment practicality.
25 days newer

Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct
Mistral AI
2025-01-30

Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Anthropic
2025-02-24
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct
Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct
2023-10-01
Available providers and their performance metrics

Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Anthropic
Bedrock
ZeroEval

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct

Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct
DeepInfra
Mistral AI