+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs Nova Pro
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads with 17.4% higher average benchmark score. Nova Pro offers 272.0K more tokens in context window than Claude 3.7 Sonnet. Nova Pro is $14.00 cheaper per million tokens. Claude 3.7 Sonnet is available on 4 providers. Overall, Claude 3.7 Sonnet is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude 3.7 Sonnet represents Anthropic's first hybrid reasoning model, capable of producing near-instant responses or extended step-by-step thinking that is visible to users. Developed with particularly strong improvements in coding and front-end web development, it allows users to control thinking budgets and balances real-world task performance with reasoning capabilities for enterprise applications.
+
+
+
+
Amazon
Amazon Nova Pro was developed as the flagship model in the Nova family, designed to provide advanced multimodal understanding across text, images, and other modalities. Built to handle complex tasks requiring sophisticated reasoning, it represents Amazon's most capable offering for enterprise applications.
3 months newer
Nova Pro
Amazon
2024-11-20
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Anthropic
2025-02-24
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Input:$3.00
Output:$15.00
+
+
+
+
Nova Pro
Input:$0.80
Output:$3.20($14.00 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Average Score:84.3%(+17.4%)
+
+
+
+
Nova Pro
Average Score:66.9%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
4 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
Bedrock
Throughput: 101 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
ZeroEval
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Avg Score:84.3%(+17.4%)
Providers:4
+
+
+
+
Nova Pro
Avg Score:66.9%
Providers:1