Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads with 19.9% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.7 Sonnet offers 72.0K more tokens in context window than Phi-4-multimodal-instruct. Phi-4-multimodal-instruct is $17.85 cheaper per million tokens. Claude 3.7 Sonnet is available on 4 providers. Overall, Claude 3.7 Sonnet is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude 3.7 Sonnet represents Anthropic's first hybrid reasoning model, capable of producing near-instant responses or extended step-by-step thinking that is visible to users. Developed with particularly strong improvements in coding and front-end web development, it allows users to control thinking budgets and balances real-world task performance with reasoning capabilities for enterprise applications.
Microsoft
Phi-4 Multimodal was created to handle multiple input modalities including text, images, and potentially other formats. Built to extend Phi-4's efficiency into multimodal applications, it demonstrates that compact models can successfully integrate diverse information types.
23 days newer

Phi-4-multimodal-instruct
Microsoft
2025-02-01

Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Anthropic
2025-02-24
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Phi-4-multimodal-instruct
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Phi-4-multimodal-instruct
Phi-4-multimodal-instruct
2024-06-01
Available providers and their performance metrics

Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Anthropic
Bedrock
ZeroEval

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Phi-4-multimodal-instruct

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Phi-4-multimodal-instruct

Phi-4-multimodal-instruct
DeepInfra