+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs Pixtral-12B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads with 27.2% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.7 Sonnet offers 191.8K more tokens in context window than Pixtral-12B. Pixtral-12B is $17.70 cheaper per million tokens. Claude 3.7 Sonnet is available on 4 providers. Overall, Claude 3.7 Sonnet is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude 3.7 Sonnet represents Anthropic's first hybrid reasoning model, capable of producing near-instant responses or extended step-by-step thinking that is visible to users. Developed with particularly strong improvements in coding and front-end web development, it allows users to control thinking budgets and balances real-world task performance with reasoning capabilities for enterprise applications.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Pixtral 12B was introduced as Mistral's multimodal vision-language model, designed to understand and reason about both images and text. Built with 12 billion parameters for integrated visual and textual processing, it extends Mistral's capabilities into multimodal applications.
5 months newer
Pixtral-12B
Mistral AI
2024-09-17
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Anthropic
2025-02-24
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Input:$3.00
Output:$15.00
+
+
+
+
Pixtral-12B
Input:$0.15
Output:$0.15($17.70 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Average Score:84.1%(+27.2%)
+
+
+
+
Pixtral-12B
Average Score:56.9%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
4 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
Bedrock
Throughput: 101 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
ZeroEval
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Avg Score:84.1%(+27.2%)
Providers:4
+
+
+
+
Pixtral-12B
Avg Score:56.9%
Providers:1