Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads with 22.5% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.7 Sonnet offers 188.7K more tokens in context window than Qwen2.5 72B Instruct. Qwen2.5 72B Instruct is $17.25 cheaper per million tokens. Claude 3.7 Sonnet supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Claude 3.7 Sonnet is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude 3.7 Sonnet represents Anthropic's first hybrid reasoning model, capable of producing near-instant responses or extended step-by-step thinking that is visible to users. Developed with particularly strong improvements in coding and front-end web development, it allows users to control thinking budgets and balances real-world task performance with reasoning capabilities for enterprise applications.
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen 2.5 72B was developed as the flagship text model in the Qwen 2.5 series, designed to provide advanced language capabilities with 72 billion parameters. Built to compete with frontier models in reasoning, coding, and general language tasks, it represents Qwen's most capable instruction-following model in this generation.
5 months newer

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2024-09-19

Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Anthropic
2025-02-24
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
Available providers and their performance metrics

Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Anthropic
Bedrock
ZeroEval

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
DeepInfra
Fireworks
Hyperbolic
Together